Friday, November 1, 2013

Rihanna Dresses as Zombie for Halloween, Shares Topless "Before" Picture


Topless zombie! Rihanna posted revealing photos of her Halloween celebration with pals on Instagram Thursday, Oct. 31. The 25-year-old singer dressed as a zombie this year and shared a topless "before" picture of herself getting ready.


"#prep," she captioned the sexy selfie. In the snapshot, Rihanna goes topless and shows major cleavage. She strategically covered herself with her newly tattooed hand while grabbing her neck. The "Diamonds" singer appeared to be wearing goth makeup with black lipstick.


PHOTOS: Celebs' 2013 Halloween costumes


She later shared a photo of the nearly fully-dressed finished product, which consisted of an open plaid shirt with a bra top underneath with blood splattered on it. She also exposed the top of Tommy Hilfiger boxers by sagging her pants, and wore big gold hoops and a bandana in her hair. She wrote as the caption: "My chola name was #ShyGirl."


Her friends all dressed similarly and she posted a group photo taken by photographers Gomillion & Leupold with the caption, "ARLETA ZOMBIE CHOLA PACK!!!"


Rihanna dresses as a zombie for Halloween on Oct. 31.

Rihanna dresses as a zombie for Halloween on Oct. 31.
Credit: Splash News



PHOTOS: Celebs in matching Halloween costumes


Rihanna also posted several snapshots of herself smoking during the party, and enjoying a Halloween-themed cake. "Just got Heauxm to this EPIC phucking cake from my Bajan chef!!" she wrote. "Thank you Esther!! Ya too sweet!! #BajanHalloween #Barbados."


The "Stay" singer celebrated Halloween one day after performing in Puerto Rico for her Diamonds World. "#PuertoRico I'm truly blown away by you!" she tweeted Wednesday. "Thank you so much for giving me one of the best nights on tour!!"


PHOTOS: Rihanna's sexiest nude moments


Tell Us: What do you think of Rihanna's Zombie costume?


Source: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/rihanna-dresses-as-zombie-for-halloween-shares-topless-before-picture-2013111
Similar Articles: david ortiz   melissa mccarthy   Hiroshi Yamauchi   floyd mayweather   Liam Payne  

Is it a boy or a girl? Germany allows babies to be neither


Berlin (AFP) - Germany on Friday became the first European country to allow babies born with characteristics of both sexes to be registered as neither male nor female, but advocates called for broader reforms.

Under the new legislation, the entry for gender can be left blank on birth certificates, effectively creating a category for indeterminate sex in the public register.

But activists promoting the rights of so-called 'intersex' people said they hoped the creation of a third gender option would open the door to broader changes limiting genital surgery on newborns with both male and female characteristics.

"It's a first, important step in the right direction," Lucie Veith, an intersex person from the northern German city of Hamburg, told AFP.

But Veith said leaving the gender undefined on birth certificates was never the main lobbying point for her group, the German chapter of the Association of Intersexed People, or others in the intersex community.

"That we forbid cosmetic genital surgeries for newborns, that is our first demand," Veith said.

The German law is intended to remove pressure on parents to quickly make a decision about controversial sex assignment surgeries for newborns, but many advocates say it does not go far enough.

"The surgeries are likely to continue in Germany," said Silvan Agius, policy director at ILGA Europe, a lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex rights group.

"Parents can already refuse these surgeries," Agius added.

"You can already say, 'No, thank you very much, I don't want any surgery until my child can choose his or her gender.'"

Operations on intersex babies and infants in many European countries take place without adequate informed consent by the patients, according to a 2012 European Commission report on the topic.

The report also found that many adults born intersex are angry these surgeries were performed without their consent.

Experts estimate one in 1,500 to 2,000 births result in a baby of indeterminate gender or both male and female gender features.

The Council of Europe for the first time last month addressed the issue, in a Parliamentary Assembly resolution calling on member states to study the prevalence of "non-medically justified operations" that may harm children and take steps to "ensure that no-one is subjected to unnecessary medical or surgical treatment that is cosmetic rather than vital for health during infancy or childhood".

Agius and other advocates worry that the new German law creates a de facto third gender category legally, but does nothing to change a society that operates largely on a gender binary with facilities such as separate male and female public toilets.

"There could be many other laws that could follow it and make it implementable and good," Agius said.

"My point is that if it remains as is... then it's greatly deficient."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/boy-girl-germany-allows-babies-neither-145934933.html
Tags: Jenna Jameson   pauly d   Apple.com   Seamus Heaney   Placenta  

Is the Constitution Written Like the Da Vinci Code?

164317291
Bond v. United States is testing whether Congress can use treaty laws to punish domestic criminal behavior.

Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images








It’s the Supreme Court case that sounds like a Lifetime movie: When Carol Bond found out that her husband was having an affair with her best friend, Myrlinda Haynes—and that Haynes was pregnant—Bond, a microbiologist who lived in the Philadelphia suburbs, put toxic chemicals on Haynes’ mailbox and her car. She got caught—and was indicted under a federal statute that makes it illegal to use toxic chemicals to harm other people. Congress had passed that statute to implement the U.S. government’s obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention, the same treaty that Syria was recently forced to sign.














Next Tuesday, Bond’s lawyers will try to persuade the Supreme Court that Congress can’t use the chemical weapons treaty as an excuse for punishing run-of-the-mill criminal behavior. This superficially appealing argument is beloved by libertarians, who have dashed to Bond’s aid, but it depends on a bizarre and tendentious reading of the Constitution that honors neither the founders’ intentions nor the practicalities of governance.










The Constitution gives Congress limited (“enumerated”) powers, which are thought mostly to exclude the ordinary stuff of criminal law like the dispute Bond was involved in. Normally, we think that if we need a law that prohibits people from attacking each other with toxic chemicals, the states, not the national government, should pass it.












And it’s true that the law that nailed Bond derives its authority circuitously. Congress enjoys the power under the Constitution’s catchall Necessary and Proper Clause to enact laws that are needed to advance other powers in the Constitution. One of those other powers is the president’s power to enter treaties with the consent of two-thirds of the Senate. Thus, the government argues, the federal law that criminalizes the harmful use of chemical weapons, privately as well as by governments and terrorists, was necessary and proper to implement the Chemical Weapons Convention.










Bond’s argument is that the president and the Senate cannot, by entering a treaty, give Congress a power that it otherwise does not have. Such a reading of the Constitution crowds out the states’ police powers and gives too much sway to Congress.










This case is a strange vehicle for examining this constitutional question. True, the feds took over the case from state authorities, but that was because Constable Dogberry of the local police thought that the toxic chemical Bond smeared on Haynes’ car was cocaine and advised her to get it washed, not because Pennsylvania law allows people to assault each other with toxic chemicals. The federal law enabled the federal government to step in—the U.S. Postal Service did surveillance and caught Bond—and to punish Bond for acts that were illegal under Pennsylvania law as well.










But libertarian critics of national government power, like the Cato Institute, which submitted an amicus brief, worry that if Bond loses this case, the United States could enter a treaty with Suriname or Lesotho to abolish the death penalty or home schooling. Then Congress could pass an implementing statute that shreds state laws on the death penalty and home schooling, which (according to the libertarians) Congress is otherwise not allowed to do.










You might wonder why Suriname or Lesotho, or the United States, would enter such a treaty. And it is most doubtful that they would. Bond v. United States has become an ideological dispute, based, as such disputes so often are, on the merely theoretical possibility that the government will abuse its powers.










Cato’s brief is rooted in a literal-minded reading of the text of the Constitution. The Treaty Clause says that the president has the power to make treaties with the consent of the Senate. The necessary and proper clause says that Congress has the power to pass laws that are necessary and proper to the exercise of other powers in the Constitution. Cato concludes that therefore Congress has the power to pass laws that are necessary and proper to the making of treaties. But it doesn’t have the power to pass laws that are necessary and proper to the implementing of the treaties, because there is no separately enumerated constitutional power for implementing. And so, according to Cato, Congress can pass laws to implement treaties only if it can rely on a source of power rooted elsewhere in the Constitution. It has no such power to criminalize the domestic use of chemicals as weapons.










One can respond to this argument by observing that Congress can rely on its old broadly interpreted friend, the power to regulate interstate commerce. But libertarians object to the broad interpretation of Congress’ powers here as well. And in the Bond case, the government didn’t make this argument in the lower courts. One can also respond by arguing that “make” has a broader meaning than Cato claims, as another amicus brief gamely does.


















Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2013/10/bond_v_united_states_the_ridiculous_libertarian_argument_in_the_supreme.html
Tags: jack o lantern   The Counselor   stenographer   Miss World 2013   Jonathan Ferrell  

Writers Illustrated: Q&A With Jeff VanderMeer, Author Of 'Wonderbook'



When you hear the phrase, "writing guide," unpleasant things may spring to mind: sentence diagrams or even — shudder to think — your high school textbook.


Now, imagine the exact opposite, and you might get Jeff VanderMeer's Wonderbook. It's a writing guide, sure, but it's unlikely you've seen one like this before. Misbegotten fish serve as models for revision. Dragons butt in from the margins to contradict lessons. There's even a talking penguin — but don't get him started on what he thinks of the duck.


Over email, VanderMeer tells me about his collaboration with Jeremy Zerfoss, the book's principal illustrator, and his unique approach to teaching writing.


It may seem a bit counterintuitive to turn to visual art when understanding writing. While you were working on the book, did you find there were any points past which words failed you, when you felt an illustrator might explain a concept better?


My mother's an artist and I tend to think visually in my own writing. So finding the right synergies of image with text while creating the book was fun, even invigorating, because it felt organic and a form of play even as it was also a serious search for useful ways to express concepts.


I'd say the "Lifecycle of a Story" exemplifies the streamlined quality of using illustrative diagrams in a way that words couldn't necessarily match. It also allowed us to extend the metaphor or analogy of writing through the point of someone publishing a story without diluting our focus (because Wonderbook isn't a career guide). So some illustrations replace the need for text entirely. Others are meant to push to the edge of what's possible — like "Approaches to Style," which uses color swatches to describe different writer styles.


While we're on the topic of illustration, your name may be bold on the cover, but you still managed to gather a number of cooks in the kitchen for this.


I gave Jeremy [Zerfoss] rough sketches along with a document detailing the text, or an overlay of text (using Microsoft Paint — I'm primitive), and he would create from that. For the Lifecycle of a Story, for example, he gave me four iterations of the frog beastie before we got to the right one. And then either he or I would create visual echoes as we went along, with reoccurring characters or situations, so resonance built up.



Then with others, like the Serbian artist Ivica Stevanovic, he was creating evocative art, not diagrams, so sometimes I'd just email him and say "I need a king hugging a hippo in a realistic style and a flat style" and he'd come back with a sketch. Or, "I need a rabbit that looks like it might be able to talk," and he'd email back and say, "Is it okay if it looks like a God-rabbit because that is the only kind of rabbit I can draw right now," and I'd say, "Sure!"





Jeff VanderMeer is a two-time World Fantasy Award winner. Jeff has written five novels, including Finch, a novel he discusses at length in Wonderbook.



Francesca Myman/Courtesy of Abrams Books


Jeff VanderMeer is a two-time World Fantasy Award winner. Jeff has written five novels, including Finch, a novel he discusses at length in Wonderbook.


Francesca Myman/Courtesy of Abrams Books


Plenty of writers refuse to even address their writing process, yet you do so in the book extensively. Was it difficult to turn the microscope on your own writing?


There's this weird thing that happens when you've been writing for a long time. It's not about achieving mastery because I firmly believe you never achieve mastery; you just acquire more tools and more experience.


But what does happen is you can forget how to articulate the basics to other people, especially in written form. So you spend some time thinking about that. You also spend time thinking about things like, for example, why plot, structure, and form seem like such slippery terms in most writing books. I finally realized I don't really think in terms of plot. I think in terms of characters that inhabit or create structures, and within those structures are beats and progressions that form what is known as plot.


In that case, it seemed more honest and less confusing to just start the Narrative Design chapter by acknowledging this difficulty in defining things. This seemed more helpful than setting out absolutes, to acknowledge there is some subjectivity.





Myrtle Von Damitz III/Courtesy of Abrams Books

You're a forgiving teacher, welcoming exceptions and different approaches to writing. So I couldn't help but think: This guy has to have some pet peeves. Are there any mistakes you just can't stand to see a young writer make?





Jeremy Zerfoss/Courtesy of Abrams Books

There are a fair number of pet peeves expressed in Wonderbook, but there are so many different kinds of writers that being too negative or "thou shalt not"-ish seems not particularly useful — and sometimes dangerous, as too many beginning writers want those Three Tips That Will Get Them Published or The One True Way. At one point, I include an aside: "If you're a writer like Leonora Carrington, these [plot] diagrams may be as useful as shoving grilled cheese sandwiches into your gas tank." Although now that I think about it, Carrington might've found shoving grilled cheese sandwiches into a gas tank creatively interesting.


In all seriousness, though, pet peeves off the top of my head include: clichés like "off the top of my head"; over-reliance on dialogue tags; writing a deep, emotive scene and then telling the reader what you just showed them; showing the reader what they'd prefer to be told (and quickly); and (this one happens a lot in our internet world) using clichéd details that appear to indicate that you took careful notes on the settings in your favorite TV show rather than from the real world.


But my number one pet peeve? Writers who flail about trying to follow trends or some idea of "writer" that isn't realistic, or some idea of them as a writer projected onto them by other people. As in all things, you'll be a lot happier being yourself. And in the long run, unless you're writing stories about intelligent grilled cheese sandwiches being shoved into gas tanks, you'll be more successful too. (I think I just laid down a challenge to someone, somewhere ... )


Interview has been condensed and edited.


Colin Dwyer is an intern with NPR Books.



Source: http://www.npr.org/2013/10/31/240512677/writers-illustrated-q-a-with-jeff-vandermeer-author-of-wonderbook?ft=1&f=1032
Related Topics: Nexus 5   Pretty Little Liars   Miley Cyrus Wrecking Ball   futurama   Daft Punk  

Nexus 5 bumper case and QuickCover listed as 'coming soon' on Play store

Sure, it's got a protective Gorilla Glass 3 coating, but there's only one way to really protect that new Nexus 5: cases. If you're breathlessly refreshing the Play store for a shot at ordering Google's new handset, you may want to check out the associated bumper case (available in black, grey, red ...


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/L03uTx-7hh8/
Related Topics: 49ers   Scott Carpenter   Kendra Spears   Dedication 5   Joanna Krupa  

Thousands protest in Greece over planned new tax


ATHENS, Greece (AP) — Thousands of protesters clogged the Greek capital's streets Thursday to demonstrate against a new property tax. The anger was registered across society, with retirees, disabled groups, shipyard workers and high school teachers among those taking part in demonstrations.

Parliament is due to vote next week on proposals to replace an emergency property tax included on electricity bills with a permanent levy, breaking a pledge made last year by the conservative-led coalition government to abolish the tax. More than 50 conservative lawmakers are demanding changes to proposals, arguing they unfairly burden their rural constituents.

The government is also planning new cuts to state benefits and the public workforce, triggering another general strike planned by unions for Nov. 6.

Outside the Labor Ministry, more than a thousand disabled demonstrators who traveled from around Greece blocked traffic outside the building, before filing through the city center in wheelchairs, on crutches and using white canes for the blind.

Deaf protesters responded to speeches by shaking both hands in the air, sign language for applause.

Yannis Vardakastanis, a blind Greek who heads the European Disability Forum, said the protest was called after disabled people were denied an exemption from the new property tax.

"We are the poorest of the poor but we must not let them turn us into victims," he said. "The financial crisis is turning into a humanitarian crisis for us."

Michalis Kouklos, a 35-year-old blind and unemployed man, took a six-hour bus ride from the northern city of Thessaloniki to attend the demonstration.

"We're here to defend the obvious things that everyone needs to live in dignity," he told the AP.

"People with serious illnesses are losing their health insurance and have to go from hospital to hospital to try and get treated. I wish there had been more of us here today because things are getting really bad."

The government has promised a six-year recession will end in 2014, but unemployment has continued to rise. By the latest measure, it was near 28 percent, with 31 percent of the country living in poverty or at risk of poverty, according to the EU statistics agency, Eurostat.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/thousands-protest-greece-over-planned-tax-133322018--finance.html
Related Topics: Tom Clancy   harry potter   NFL Network   Million Second Quiz   princess diana  

Daniel Straus puts tough times behind as he prepares for Pat Curran fight


LONG BEACH, Calif. -- As sweat dripped through his dreadlocks after a spirited workout on Thursday, Daniel Straus declared himself a happy man.


"Fight week is awesome," the American Top Team fighter said. "I live for this s---. I love to compete."


Straus, who challenges Pat Curran for the Bellator featherweight title on Saturday's main card at Long Beach Arena, hasn't fought for more than a year.


"To be out for so long, it sucks. To know that you're supposed to be doing one thing, .... I've been waiting and itching for my time to fight."


The Cincinnati native has been out of action, but that doesn't mean he's been out of the headlines. In a tumultuous late-winter span, Straus first had to pull out of the originally planned April 4 date against Curran due to a broken hand suffered in training. Then he was arrested in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., and charged with driving with a suspended license and possession of marijuana, synthetic cannabis, and ecstasy.


The 29-year old Straus eventually reached a plea deal in order to receive probation and stay out of prison.


The way Straus sees it, the adversity he faced this year will only make him stronger as he goes to meet Curran.


"I just rolled with the punches," Straus said. "My hand held up through rehab, I dealt with my issues and kept pursuing my dream I'm here for. I'm here to be a world champion. Ups and downs don't bother me, ins and out don't bother me."


What did bother him, though, was the way his arrest was portrayed.


"It wasn't me just in the car," Straus said. "It didn't come out in the media because nobody knew that. So they didn't know it wasn't solely me. But that wasn't how it came out. It was heartbreaking to see how it did come out and how people portrayed it. I kind of took offense to the fact that no one came to me and asked me my side. Everyone just wanted to run and report what they read somewhere else. No one ever came and got it out of my mouth. That was heartbreaking."


With his troubles just about in his rear-view mirror, Straus can focus on his bout with Curran. This is a rematch of a 2009 match in Illinois contested in the XFO promotion, won by Curran on a second-round knockout.


Straus views the loss as the most important learning experience of his career. Since that time, he's won 17 of 18 fights.


"I can't go to that fight, examine that fight, and try to fight him again off that fight," Straus said. "I'll lose, again. Pat can't watch that fight, examine that fight, and fight me again. He'll take the ass-whipping I got that night. We're both two different fighters from the time I first met. We've grown as people, we've grown as fighters."


In fact, he feels so much has changed since that time, there's almost no point in going back and looking at the tape of the first fight.


"It really opened my eyes as to the sport. Since that fight of won 17 of 18 fights, I went on a two-year winning streak of 12 fights. That fight changed me because going into that fight I knew I could beat Pat. And I got beat. So I started taking this sport seriously."


Curran, meanwhile, returned the sentiment.


"He's so much better, so much more of a complete fighter than he was for our first fight," Curran said Thursday. "I'm better, he's better, I'm looking at this like a brand-new challenge, not like a rematch."


Win or lose, Straus is just glad he's back doing what he loves.


"I love this sport, it's been good to me," Straus said. "Being an athlete's been good to me. Sports have always been my savior. I've always been in and out of this, in and out of that, but I've always come back to sports. It's good. I don't want to be that guy that's losing 12 in a row and fighting for a paycheck."


Source: http://www.mmafighting.com/2013/10/31/5053138/daniel-straus-puts-tough-times-behind-as-he-prepares-for-pat-curran
Category: Jonas Brothers   WWE   brandon jacobs   nasdaq   amc